The power and importance of om ॐ is not understood in its proper perspective. It is important that supreme value of this akṣara (अक्षर) om ॐ understood in its proper perspective. In the first place, ॐ is the connecting factor between a mantra, the practitioner and Brahman. Why ॐ is accepted as akṣara? Because Vedas say so and Upaniṣad-s explain this further. This is how it is explained in Vāc (pp 15). “It is likely that the syllable ॐ, the initiator, was also, as early as Brāhmaṇa-s (Brāhmaṇa-s are explained as rules for the employment of the mantras or hymns at various sacrifices, with detailed explanations of their origin and meaning), the continuous humming sound it will become at a later date in the Upaniṣad-s. Though imperceptible, it would underlay the whole ceremony ……”
Rig Veda (I.164.39) subtly refers to ॐ. This verse says, “The Supreme Lord is omnipresent like space and eternal like his word… {word here is explained as ‘upon which akṣara, the indestructible syllable, the supreme position (parame vyoman) of all the gods (viśvedevāḥ} taking their seats}…..the one who understands this comes close to Him and those who do know this cannot reach Him.” In another context it is said, “Somehow it happened that he could not take the essence from one syllable (ॐ); just of ॐ. This syllable (ॐ) became this speech and this speech namely ॐ became the essence of breath……”
The above Vedic references go to prove the importance of ॐ and based on this, Kulārṇava Tantra (XV.56) says, “A mantra in its beginning entails the impurity of birth and at the end of impurity of death. Associated with these two impurities, a mantra does not fructify (impurities are explained as not prefixing and suffixing ॐ).
Taittirīya Upaniṣad (I.viii.1) says, “om iti brahma; om iti sarvam; …..” which clearly says that there is no difference between ॐ and Brahman and this statement is further emphasized by the next verse which is says ॐ is everything (omnipresent). This goes to prove that without ॐ, Brahman cannot be attained. All of us know that the very purpose of Mahāṣoḍaśi Mantra is only liberation (Ṣoḍaśī kevalṁ mokṣa sādhanam – Ṣoḍaśī is meant only for liberation).
Praśna Upaniṣad (V.6 and 7)) says, “He who meditates on three letters of AUM (ॐ) separately will end up being subject to death. But if they are taken together, this meditation is rightly done……If you are able to meditate on that deity in the right manner, you will know the real meaning of ॐ and once you know the meaning, you go far beyond. If you meditate on ॐ as Brahman, it takes you to the higher worlds. It is again through ॐ that you attain the state of peace and fearlessness and you overcome age. You attain immortality and become one with Brahman.” (Please compare this with the last line of the previous paragraph).
Kaṭha Upaniṣad (I.ii.16) says, “ॐ is Brahman with attributes and also without attributes. He knows this ॐ can get whatever he wishes.” It must be remembered that Brahman without attributes is Śiva and Brahman with attributes is Śakti. There are subsequent verses also to explain this in Kaṭha Upaniṣad.
Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad (1) begins with by saying, “ॐ is this phenomenal world. To make this clear, it is the past, the present and future. All this is nothing but ॐ. If there is anything beyond this, that too is ॐ.”
It is also that ॐ is the root mantra out of which all other mantra arise. It is clear that without ॐ in the beginning of any mantra, rest of the bījākṣara-s of a mantra will not have any power. Further ॐ is also compared to prāṇa (vital air; our inhalation and exhalation). Without prāṇa how can we sustain and similarly how can a mantra work without ॐ in the beginning?
There are quotations from Śivapurāṇa. It says, “ॐ, known as praṇava is so called because it is the ideal guide to liberation (mokṣa), by eliminating karma of those who recite and worship it……” There are innumerable references to ॐ and its importance towards attaining liberation. All mantras are practiced for two purposes. One is for realizing the Self and the ultimate purpose is to attain liberation. The latter always succeeds the former and this is the pinnacle of our spiritual journey.
Patañjali in his Yoga sūtra-s (I.27) says, “tasya vācakah praṇavaḥ”. This means that there is no difference between ॐ and Śiva and we know that Śiva is the one who can give liberation and not Śakti, who is only Śiva-jñāna-pradāyinī (Lalitā Sahasranāma 727). This interpretation is reproduced below for easy reference.
“She imparts the knowledge of Śiva, the Ultimate. Śiva jñāna (knowledge) means the knowledge of the Brahman, which is also known as the Supreme knowledge. To know Śiva, one should first know His Śaktī, who alone is capable of leading a person to the Brahman or Śiva. Rāmāyaṇa says ‘wind can be realized through movements, fire can be realised through heat and Śiva can be realized only through Śaktī.’ It can also be said that Śiva is the source of knowledge for Her.
It is said śaṁkaraṁ caitanyam which means that Śiva is both jñāna and kriyā. He is the sovereign, pure free will in knowledge and action. Based upon this principle, Śiva Sūtra-s opens by saying caitanyamātmā. Caitanyam means consciousness of the highest purity and knowledge. There is no difference between Brahman and the highest form of consciousness. But how Śaktī alone is capable of unravelling Śiva? This is answered by Śiva Sūtra (I.6) again which says that by meditating on Śaktī, the universe disappears as a separate entity thereby unveiling Self illuminating Śiva. The process of such happening is described in Spanda Kārikā (I.8) (another treatise of Kashmiri Saivism) which says ‘the empirical individual cannot ward off the urge of desires. But entering the energetic circle of the Self (Śiva), he becomes equal to that Self.’ The seeker of Śiva becomes Śiva himself. This is known as Śiva jñāna and She imparts this kind of Supreme knowledge.
It is also said that Śiva cannot be attained without first realising Śaktī. She alone can lead one to Śiva. Śiva is inaccessible directly. Unless She chooses to impart the required Supreme knowledge, none can realise Śiva. Hence, She is called Śiva-jñāna-pradāyinī.”
Thus there are very strong, authentic and proven evidences to prove that ॐ is the cause of any mantra and if ॐ is not prefixed to any mantra, the mantra becomes ineffective. And if we go with Kulārṇava Tantra and various Upaniṣad-s cited above, one can understand the importance of ॐ and its presence at the beginning of any mantras. If this is not done, then the mantra will not fructify.
To conclude, we must understand that purpose of any mantra is only to get liberation. There is no point in arguing whether ॐ is to be prefixed or not. This has been explained with help of various sources in this particular article. My Guruji told me that without ॐ, mantra will never be fructified. If we place ॐ in the beginning, I have observed that one is able to reach the highest spiritual level within six months. If prefixing ॐ is a mistake, these men and women would not have attained this highest spiritual level. What is important is the goal and our goal is liberation. I am of the opinion that ॐ should be prefixed to all mantras without fail. If this is not followed, then anyone could be wasting his or her precious life in performing fruitless sādhana. Even after this detailed explanation, if doubts still persist, nothing else can be done. Beyond this point, it is not right on my part to comment on this issue and hence, I close this issue with this article.
This article is posted here as my reply to various observations made in Mahāṣoḍaśī Mantra explained
Anonymous
May 17, 2014 12:50 PM
Your most usefull article till date on Manthras.
Reply
Anonymous
May 18, 2014 03:49 AM
This is a brilliant exposition of the concept. The other master stroke that Raviji produced is the concept of aligning the breath with the mantra. I think aligning the breath is the most critical concept in Mantra Shastra. Thank you Raviji!
Reply
Anonymous
June 09, 2014 02:00 PM
I respectfully disagree about needing to add OM before all mantras. Several mantras have same tattvam as OM and they dont need extra addition. This is not what any traditional sampradays teaches. Please learn from a knowledagble Guru.
I read something related in this web site -
http://www.kamakotimandali.com/blog/index.php?p=1388&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Reply
Balavivek
June 10, 2014 01:55 PM
Do not respectfully "disagree", but respectfully participate in the discussion by giving your view point and not something that can be read!And please, I pray and urge you to define "traditional sampradaya".
Reply
Anonymous
June 10, 2014 08:03 PM
"Several Mantras have same tattvam as OM". Can you please enlist the Bijas with the same tattva as OM. Except may be Hrim, no other qualifies. How can any "Knowledgeable Guru" can deviate from the Pramana of Shruti and Tantra literature. If you are comments are specific to the "Om before Shodasi" controversy, please be specific. don't post these kind of half baked comments in a respectable blog like this.
Reply
Anonymous
June 11, 2014 11:20 AM
Very nice article from Kamakoti Mutt, thanks for link, the author is not thinking emotionally and presenting logical facts, common sense and scriptures. The article is well balanced. We appreciate what Raviji does but we should not blindly accept everything, this is not cheerleading.
Reply
Anonymous
June 11, 2014 01:07 PM
You need to read the article quoted by the other person properly. There is a specific example right there. The Pramanas are quoted very clearly in the article, explained and misinterpretation of the verse from Kularnava Tantra is clarified by pointing to Trikuta Rahasya. Your comments suggest your unfamiliarity with Tantra. Do not discard the view of some of the most respected and scholarly practitioners present today without objective examination. Anyone who reads that article should be doubtless that there is no need to add omkara before sodasi. I am from guhananda mandali and completely agree with the article. Just because someone added om without proper justification does not mean it is the right behavior. There are three people right here stating that om is not added in their lineages. Which lineage adds it? Show me?
Reply
Anonymous
June 11, 2014 10:27 PM
It is Kamakodi mandali and not Kamakodi Mutt. They have a separate website. Let us look at the article mentioned in the discussions above which is so full of "logical facts and common sense". The article mentions that ".Tantras like Yoginīhṛdaya explain various meanings of Srīvidyā mantra and none of them talk about the need or requirement for adding a Praṇava at the beginning of the mantra. In fact, it is stressed that the three kūṭas of the mantra, along with the turīya bīja, represent the gross and subtle aspects of the śuddha praṇava" Then why would anybody waste their time in receiving and reciting the mantra instead of simply chanting OM is anybody's guess? Taking the debate further, OM, everywhere is mentioned as the Bija leading to Moksha. Then why Shodasi? What is the need for elaborate initiation rituals and "Tradtitional Sampradayas"? can anybody clarify.
Reply
Anonymous
June 12, 2014 10:37 AM
It is Kamakoti, not Kamakodi.
Reply
Anonymous
June 12, 2014 10:49 AM
Thanks for your excellent observation.
Reply
Anonymous
June 16, 2014 09:59 PM
Thank you for introducing me to the excellent site Kamakotimandali.com. It seems to be the best site on Srividya I have come across so far.
Reply
Ram
June 23, 2014 05:12 PM
The same Kamakoti Mandali also says this. Please refer and post your views please. http://www.kamakotimandali.com/blog/index.php?p=293&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Reply
Vivek K V
June 23, 2014 06:18 PM
Yes Ram, strangely for reason known to them they have said the "opposite" which reflects in the recent post on OM.Thank you for bringing it to the notice of the readers.
Reply
Ram
June 24, 2014 04:00 PM
Yes, I think the mandali is a platform for upasakas in general with alleigance to several lineages but having opposing views. The best therefore, is to trust the Guru completely and unconditionally and submit & surrender oneself to the Guru's feet. Paramba alone knows what is correct and She alone will reveal the best way forward. This argument will continue endlessly.
When there are different views within a community such as the Kamakoti Mandali, which I know for sure constitutes stalwarts of Sri Vidya and Tantra, there is not going to be any other place that one can turn to in order to find answers. Trust unto Her alone will reveal the truth.
Reply
KP Vidya Shankar
May 04, 2016 01:00 PM
Initially molecules were smallest, then atoms, then electrons, then bosons.... later we may find more subtler matter. Same with energies. Gurus dont waste time of sisya by asking them to debate or use logic. They say PRACTISE. OM is pranava, AUM is pranava, Ganesha is pranava, Subramanya is pranava, Siva is pranava, U R pranava, I am pranava.... I can only say this, OM/AUM can be used by all, but sodasi mantra.. please take it from a Guru. Experiencing the effect of mantras, bijas, OM, AUM etc will resolve conflicting issues in hands of a GURU. And I can say with AUTHORITY, that the TANTRAS can fool the unwary with their assertions.
Reply
Jayanth
February 24, 2017 11:06 PM
Is there any purascarana for OM mantra. Like 1 million 10 million etc. Since this is such a powerful mantra is there any guidelines for this? Ie for purascarana
Reply
Replies
MANBLUNDER
February 25, 2017 10:00 AM
OM is not a mantra. It is Brahman Himself, from which everything else orginates. Hence there is no purascharana for OM.
Reply
Svarupanandanatha
July 11, 2019 08:28 PM
That, in my opinion, is not accurate. Every major Tantra talks about puraścraṇa of praṇava. Take Prapancasāra for example: दीक्षितो मनुमिमं शतलक्षं संजपेत् प्रतिहुनेच्च दशाम्शम् । पायसैर्घृतयुतैश्च तदन्ते विप्रभूरुहभवाः समिधो वा ॥
Reply