Understanding Philosophies – Part 15: Trika Philosophy – Part 1
Apart from the recently discussed Advaita philosophy, there is yet another authentic and several centuries (eighth and ninth centuries) old philosophy called Trika philosophy. This non-dualistic philosophy originated during the eighth century in Kashmir, India. This philosophy is also known as Kashmiri Śhaivism. Trika means three fold and Trika philosophy talks about three aspects of Divinity – Śhiva, Śakti and nara or Para, Parāpara and apara. Para means the best, the highest, the Supreme, etc. Para refers to Śhiva. Parāpara is the intermediary state between Para and apara. Parāpara is the state of both absolute and relativity (Einstein's theory of relativity), which is known as Śakti, without which nara or human cannot realize Para. The third one is apara, where the supremacy of para is lost and gets manifested. Apara refers to nara, a genuine spiritual aspirant. How nara seeks Para through Parāpara is Trika phiolophy. Para is the ultimate Consciousness (Cit), which alone is independent (Independent Power of Authority and Autonomy). It is the cause for creation. Para is the state of Supreme Self, which is called as Brahman in Advaita philosophy. Para or Śhiva decides to create through His exclusive independent authority, which He transfers to Parāpara or Śakti. When Śakti manifests, the manifested objects are nara or humans and all other sentient and insentient organisms and matter.
Unless one understands how the creation happens, it is not possible to progress spiritually. Both spiritually and scientifically, the process of creation remains the same. Though the spiritual and scientific explanations do not either contradict or complement each other; yet, spiritual explanation goes far deeper and subtler than the known sources of scientific explanations. Trika system explains everything from the angle of Śhiva, with authority and conclusive proof affirms that Śhiva is Brahman; hereinafter, wherever the term Śhiva is used, it refers to Supreme Brahman. In other words, Brahman henceforth is called Śhiva. When Śhiva contracts (macrocosm to microcosm), it is creation and when Śhiva expands (microcosm becomes one with macrocosm), it is dissolution. Through practice called as sādhana, a contracted person (a human being) seeks Śhiva, the Absolute for his liberation. Therefore, it is important to understand Śhiva.
Śhiva is beyond human perception. Every atom that exists in the universe has Śhiva component (God particle) in it. Without Śhiva component, nothing can exist. Śhiva is the soul (cause) of every being, without which, no being can ever exist. Thus, He becomes omnipresent and becomes the cause of all the objects. He is like a tiny seed of a huge banyan tree. Without the seed, the gigantic tree is not possible and in the same way, without Śhiva, the existence of the universe is not possible. When we say existence of universe, it includes the entire movable and immovable objects as well as human beings. Thus Śhiva becomes not only the cause for the universe but also becomes the Absolute. Absolute because, Śhiva is beyond any limitations; cause because, without Him as the Self within, creation is not possible. He is the cause for causal, subtle and gross bodies. Self is the cause for causal body (prāṇa), causal body is the cause for subtle body (mind) and subtle body produces gross body (shape and form). This also establishes His omnipresence and omnipotence.
Trika philosophy says Consciousness is Śhiva. Consciousness is known as cit in Sanskrit. This is a masculine gender word. Feminine gender of cit is citii. Cit is Śhiva and Citti is Śakti. Citti is the Power of Cit. Cit literally means to understand or to comprehend, etc. Citta is different from Cit. Citta means the mind and its activities like thinking, visualizing, etc applicable to individual mind. Cit is unlimited and citta is limited. There is difference between Advaita and Trika philosophies while explaining Cit. Advaita says sat-cit- ānanda (existence-consciousness-bliss) is Brahman, who is always considered as niṣkriya or inactive. Trika says that Cit is not only Pure Consciousness but also it is Self-illuminating or Prakāśa. Advaita also says that Brahman is Light. But Trika emphasises on this Self-illumination aspect. When there is light, it alone cannot reflect the light. It needs objects around it, so that the light can be realized through the presence of objects. When there is light and objects are in a place, the light has to be reflected on the objects around the light to get them realized. This is called vimarśa, which means reflection. Prakāśa has to depend upon vimarśa to reflect its own light. At the same time, vimarśa has no significance if there is no light. Therefore, prakāśa and vimarśa are interdependent. Prakāśa is Śhiva and Vimarśa is Śakti and they are interdependent. Light has inherent capacity to reflect as the primary aspect of light is cognition. Without light cognition is not possible. When there is light, the aspect of cognition is very much there in the light itself. In other words, Prakāśa has Vimarśa aspect within itself. The latter is inherent aspect of the former and cannot be separated as another entity. In the same way, Śhiva has Śakti inherent in Him. Śhiva and Śakti always stand united and they are inseparable. This state of Śhiva and Śakti is known as yamala (paired). Therefore, Citi (the Consciousness that brings about the worldly process - Śakti) is inherent in Cit (the foundational Consciousness, the Absolute - Śiva).
Śhiva is the Absolute. There is nothing beyond Him, Nobody knows His origin and He does not have a parentage. He is both ādi (from the beginning) and anādi (existence from eternity). He is the cause of the universe and He is omnipresent. He pervades the entire universe through its length and breadth. There is not even a single place where He is not present. He is present in all pure things and impure things, all good things and all bad things. Literally speaking He is beyond human apprehension through sensory apparatuses. He has no shape and form. He alone is Self-illuminating. Hence, He is called Prakāśa. Śhiva has a unique power, which is known as Svātantrya Śhakti, the independent power of authority, the power of His Will. The entire universe is nothing but the reflection of His Svātantrya Śhakti, which is more pronounced in the first five tattva-s and less pronounced in the subsequent 31 tattva-s. (Study of tattva-s is being taken up later). The entire universe is His projection and is not something that is different from Him. If the universe is different from Him, then there arises duality. Therefore, the universe is the reflection of His own Consciousness and not something different. This reflection is not like an object getting reflected in a mirror. Svātantrya Śhakti, His independent Will alone is the cause of His reflection. That is why He is omnipresent. If we keep thousands of pot filled with water before the sun, all the pots reflect the sun; but the sun remains only one. It is only the reflection that makes the sun as many. But in His reflection, no object is perceived. It is all His Svātantrya śhakti. Here, reflection happens through tattva-s or principles, which are not objects. Śhiva transfers His Svātantrya Śhakti, His unique Power to Śhakti, authorizing Her to create the universe. After handing over His Svātantrya Śhakti to Śhakti, Śhiva continues to remain in the state Cit. He has nothing to do as far as the worldly matters are concerned, as they are taken care of by Śhakti. However, He continues to be the cause of every creation in the form of multitude of souls. Soul has no significant role to play except to witness all the actions of a body, within which the soul is present. Without soul, a being cannot exist. Even in the form of multitude of souls, He continues to remain in the state of Cit. There are certain differences between Śhiva, the Supreme and individual souls. Former is Absolute and the later are His reflections. This difference arises because of māyā (illusion). As Śhiva, He is full of Consciousness or Cit. When He contracts i.e. during the process of becoming a soul from His original form as Soul, the Pure Consciousness becomes the mind. This is the reason for saying that human life is precious, where one has a well defined mind. In the process of contraction, Pure Consciousness becomes mind and in the process of realizing the Self, this process is reversed, where mind goes back to Śhiva, who has created it. Now, Śhiva, who is full of Pure Consciousness becomes a jīva, an embodied soul. Gross body is formed around this soul through causal and subtle bodies and when the soul leaves the body, death occurs. Therefore, soul becomes the cause of the body. The difference between Soul and soul is empowerment. During the process of contraction, the Power of Śiva completely goes away, making the soul powerless. The soul loses its divinity, but the identity of Śiva is not lost. Otherwise, there is no logic in seeking Him within. As Śiva is omnipresent, He continues to be present everywhere including the individual soul. Contraction happens only due to Śiva’s Will. How Śiva contracts is the process of creation.
Though Svātantrya Śhakti and Māyā are the same, yet there is a significant difference between the two. Svātantrya Śhakti permits two way traffic of going up and climbing down; but māyā allows one way traffic only. It allows only downward journey and not the upward journey. Svātantrya śhakti is pure and māyā is impure. Pure Svātantrya Śhakti becomes impure māyā śhakti. This impurity arises due to three types of mala-s (mala means impurity), which will be discussed subsequently.
Power of Śhiva is Śhakti. They are not different as Śhakti is inherent in Śhiva. To understand easily, their unified Nature is known as Paramaśhiva. Paramaśhiva is incomprehensible and hence cannot even be deliberated or described. Śhakti is present in Paramaśhiva only as a trace. Śhakti is always associated with “I” consciousness and as “I” is absent in Paramaśhiva and hence She does not have any significant role in Paramaśhiva. Paramaśhiva exists in all the 36 tattva-s and at the same time He is not part of these 36 tattvas. Cessation of transmigration, which is known as liberation or Śhivavyāpti can happen only if the Yogī enters the state of Paramaśhiva. Paramaśhiva manifests in the form of first of five tattvas – Śhiva, Śhakti, Sadāśhiva, Īśvara and Śuddhavidyā. Whatever discussed here is about Śhiva and not Paramaśhiva.
Śhakti is the Svātantrya Śhakti of Śhiva. It is Śhiva’s exclusive and independent Power. There is no power beyond His Power. A person’s power is inherent in him and in the same way, Śhiva’s Power is inherent in Him and His inherent Power is known as Śhakti. Śhiva is the static energy and Śhakti is dynamic energy. Śhiva is the masculine energy and Śhakti is the feminine energy. There is no significant difference between Śhakti and Śhiva, tattva-s two and one. They are subjectivity as against objectivity expressed through the rest of the tattva-s. They represent universal “I” ness, the ultimate purity. If one really wants to find some difference between the two, it can be said that Śhiva is knowledge or jñāna and Śhakti is kriyā or action. The union of Śhiva and Śhakti is generally expressed in the form of Ardhanārīśvara (a form of Śhiva with half of the body being His body and other half is Śhakti’s body). The material world is full of kriyā or action, which is the manifestation of Śhakti. Lot is written about worshipping Her as laid down by different śāstra-s, the predominant being Tantra śāstra-s. Śhakti’s manifestation can be understood only through the study of 36 tattvas. Śhakti is always identified with Cit or Śhiva. When Cit and Citti conjoin, it becomes only Cit as Citti is a derivative of Cit. There is no duality here, as Kashmir Shavaism is emphatic on non-dualism. There is no difference between Śhiva and Śhakti. How can one’s power could be different from him; his power will always inherent in him? In the same way, the power of Śhiva is inherent in Him and we call this power as Śhakti. Power in Sanskrit is known as śhakti. Cit Śhakti (the Power of Consciousness; also known as Śhakti) is that aspect of Śhiva to reveal Himself.
Cit means pure Consciousness and Citti means thinking. Pure Consciousness loses its purity and begins to think. But Shivaism in general do not accept the theory of sin. When one is Śhiva, how can Śhiva commit a sin?
(to be continued)
Further Readings:
Srivathsa rao i
July 03, 2014 06:06 PM
Sir,
1)Can you please tell the difference between kashmir shaivism and advaita vedanta?.....which is astika(vedic) school?
2)why kashmir shaivism is not considered as one among the 6 astika schools of hindu ism?
3)weather abhinava gupta of kashmir got defeated by adi shankara and made black magic against adi shankara?
4)krishna only said brahman is NISKRIYA, in geetha...but how can kashmir shaivism say athman is having activity???...because abhinava gupta only wrote bhashya for bhagavath geetha....what he say for nishkriya brahman...of krishna there?
and also Sir,
1) why abhinava gupta is not considered as one among ...the three great acharyas of india...that is 1)adi shankara
2)madhvacharya
3)ramanujacharya???
or in other words...why he is not considered as a great mathacharya of india?
Reply
MANBLUNDER
July 06, 2014 01:59 PM
Major differences between Advaita of Śaṃkarācārya and Kashmiri Shivaism are the following.
1) According Advaita, Brahman is Light and knowledge; It is inactive. According to Kashmiri Shiavaism (hereinafter referred as KS) Consciousness is both Light and activity. KS uses Shiva instead of Brahman.
2) According to Advaita māyā is action and cannot be described. Brahman is active only when He is affected māyā. But according to KS, māyā is the Power of Shiva, His own Shakti, His Svātantrya Śakti. It is the Power of Shiva and is real (as opposed to indefinable as per Advaita).
3) Māyā is the source of separation as per Advaita; As per KS, māyā is integral part of Shiva.
4) According to Advaita, individual soul is inactive; but according to KS sṛṣṭi, sthiti, saṁhāra, tirodhāna and anugraha exist in individual souls also. In other words, individual is also Shiva as per KS.
5) Advaita says that universe is the manifestation of Brahman and not Real. But according to KS, the entire universe is Shiva and hence Real.
6) During liberation, the universe is invalidated according to Advaita. According to KS, universe appears in the form of Shiva Consciousness during Liberation.
7) This difference is significant. According to Advaita, when spiritual ignorance (avidyā) is removed through spiritual wisdom (vidyā), one is liberated (Self-realization is different from Liberation). But according to KS, there are two types of ignorance; one is inherent and another is intellectual. By gaining spiritual wisdom, only inherent ignorance can be removed. Intellectual ignorance can be removed only by Śaktipāta. This is possible only through proper initiation by a Self-realized Guru.
Reply
Srivathsa rao i
July 06, 2014 02:20 PM
Sir, thank you sir...for such a wonderfull explanation.... 1)But krishna only said...in geetha brahman is inactive....how abhinava gupta,,,pretend this in his commentary on bhagavath geetha,,,,,in support if kashmir shaivism...because in kashmir shaivism...brahman is with acitvity??? PLS answer this sir....
Reply
Srivathsa rao i
September 21, 2014 08:53 PM
Sir,
I have one question,please answer......
1)my opinion is,through SAKTHI PATH ....we cannot get permanent....effect.....
for example,......
a)one learn bharathanatyam....where there is shakthi and knowledge...or knowledge with activity....if we leave the practice for few years...his efficiency in baratha natyam will reduce.....
b) a weight lifter...lifts 85 kg of weight,,,,,it is knowledge with shakthi...if he leaves the practice ,,,,for few months...he cannot even lift ....65 kg.......
SO,WHAT WE CAN CONCLUDE IS .....
what ever knowledge we get through shakthi ,or KNOWLEDGE WITH ACTIVITY ,is decreasing with TIME.....or its efficiency is decreasing with time AND ONE DAY IT DOESN'T EXIT.... we have to practice regularly to avoid decrease in efficiency......
So,knowldge with activity is not brahman....brahman is inactive knowledge......or in other words......
NISKRIYA JGNANA.....which will never perish.or decrease with time..and always present......
SO,ADVAITA TELLS TO BECOME NISKRIYA KNOWLDGE...WHICH IS NOTHING BUT MUKTHI...,,,,,,
because mukthi is heighest level...then after..we want nothing.....but here in kashmir shaivism....even in mukthi we have to practice shathipath...to preserve the efficiency...of that knowledge.......which means...even mukthi is not ULTIMATE.....we have to work...to preserve over existence........which cannot be mukthi...because...mukthi is liberation ......but ,in kashmir shaivism.....to keep liberation...we have to work....which is for away from.....truth.....
Sir,please reply...for this...I am waiting for your answer.......what you say for this?
Reply
Replies
MANBLUNDER
September 21, 2014 09:31 PM
Whatever the path we follow, we cannot attain Liberation without sādhana. Without practice, proper configuration of mind, intellect and consciousness cannot take place. Śakti-pāta is not something that we practice. It is the reward for our Love towards Him. Even Advaita clearly says that knowledge alone does not lead to Liberation. Knowledge is an essential and supportive part of our path to Liberation. There is no difference between Kashmiri Savaism and Advaita. Both are non-dualistic in nature. Liberation is not a easy process; we have to work hard.
Reply
Srivathsa rao i
September 21, 2014 09:40 PM
Sir,
yes....I accept that...we have to work hard to get liberated....but after getting liberated....there is no need to work....to sustain liberation...so, liberation is inacitve state...or advaita state is inactive state....it is not active state,SO BRAHMAN IS NISHKRIYA OR INACTIVE....if it active state...we have to always practice to keep liberated...which is against to the definition of liberation.....which means...free from all.....
what you say for this sir?
Reply
Replies
MANBLUNDER
September 22, 2014 02:39 PM
Mukti is different from Mokṣa. Only latter leads to cessation from transmigration. Brahman is always inactive. Only His Power is active. After Mokṣa. there is no need for anything, as we are becoming One with Brahman. But in the case of Mukti, it is only temporary cessation from transmigration.
There is no question of sustaining liberation. It is only a fraction of a second moment of merging individual soul with Brahman, who is always inactive.
Reply
Srivathsa rao i
September 22, 2014 08:31 PM
Sir,
1)you accepted that brahman is inactive,but according to kashmir shaivism....brahman is active....how is this possible?
2)After moksha,there is no power,only...brahaman state....which is called as swayam prakasha...sat-chit-anada will be there...so ,that power...dissapears...as dream dissappears when we wake up.....so that power...or brahman's power which kashmir shaivism says is mithya just like dream...and brahman is the only reality........that is advaita...
3)krishna only said...in geetha brahman is inactive....how abhinava gupta,,,pretend this in his commentary on bhagavath geetha,,,,,in support if kashmir shaivism...because in kashmir shaivism...brahman is with acitvity???
please answer for this sir.....
Reply
MANBLUNDER
September 23, 2014 05:40 PM
In Hinduism, there are many Philosophies. These are different spiritual paths to one Goal. The seeker should choose & follow the Philosophy which goes with his own mindset. If the idea of Inactive Brahman appeals to you, follow Advaita. If Active Brahman goes with your mindset, follow Kasmir Shaivism. These Philosophies are just the helping tools according to the different kinds of seekers. Nothing is wrong or bad but yes, one should choose a path which satisfies his mind and of course, once chosen, one should follow it to the core with absolute faith.According to Advaita Vedantic approach, Ultimate Reality, which is Consciousness or the Self or Brahman, is pure Knowledge. It is static or inactive or niṣkriya. But according to Āgamic Tradition, Consciousness is knowledge (jñāna) & activity (Kriya) in One. Śiva & Śakti, Jñāna & Kriy
Reply
Srivathsa rao i
September 23, 2014 08:58 PM
Sir,
I accept...your point...that..taking any philosophy is up to us,but we have to take the path of known...jgnani.....krishna is considered as jagath guru,by all hindu mithology,
1) Krishna only said that,there exits two separate things in this world,purusha and prakruthi,there is no prakruthi or (kriya) in brahman...and brahman is nishkriya...so,what is ksahmir shaivism's stand here...
2)If kriya is there in brahman...what exactly is that kriya?or which kriya?jgnana in brahman is nothing but his (brahman's) personality that is sat-chit-anada,...but what about kriya?
3)Coming to current of water,one day that water will rest...that time there will be no current in water....so current cannot be considered as water's attribute....similarly,on moksha...there will be no kriya in brahman...so brahman is nishkriya....if there is kriya in brahman in moksha,according to kashmir shaivism....what exaclty that kriya which will be there in athman in moksha.?
4)Jgnana in moksha,nothing but bliss...which will be there in athman....
Pls answer for this Sir........
Reply
Replies
MANBLUNDER
September 23, 2014 09:27 PM
I am not knowledgeable enough to answer your queries. I am sorry.
Reply
srivatsava
November 25, 2017 06:44 PM
@srivathsa rao. Give me your whatsapp number if available. I shall clear your doubts.
Reply
Replies
MANBLUNDER
December 01, 2017 06:09 PM
Thank you for your willingness to clear doubts. I will be grateful, if you could post your clarifications in this comment column, so that all of us will be benefited by your clarification.
Reply